GeForce GTX 980 Ti SLI vs. Radeon R9 Fury X Crossfire
Unleashed earlier this year, Nvidia's 3072 CUDA Cadre GTX Titan X was every enthusiast'due south dream until it was overshadowed by the GTX 980 Ti a few months later on. Although the GTX 980 Ti is slower, it lets power users bask 4K gaming for $650 versus $1,000 for the Titan X.
We got our get-go expect at Nvidia'due south GTX 980 Ti reference card almost two months ago and have yet to check out a lath partner's production model. Compared to reference designs by Nvidia and AMD, their partners usually come with creations that run cooler and quieter.
A perfect example of this is Gainward'due south GTX 980 Ti "Aureate Sample", which features a xv% manufacturing plant overclock that Gainward says provides 11% more performance on average. The GTX 980 Ti GS has a "Zero RPM fan design," meaning all three fans tin can be stopped until the GPU temperature rises to 60°C or above. Gainward also says its card operates 10°C cooler and is 6dB quieter under manufacturing plant overclocked conditions.
Not wanting to simply simply revisit the GTX 980 Ti's performance, we'll be hooking up 2 of Gainward's cards for some SLI testing and to brand the numbers even more than interesting, we'll add together a pair of AMD'south Radeon R9 Fury X cards in Crossfire.
The Fury X comes with the same $650 MSRP and ane of them delivers virtually the same functioning as a unmarried GTX 980 Ti at 4K.
While both cards can provide playable performance at 4K, many games dip down to and below 30fps, so folks looking to achieve shine 4K gameplay will undoubtedly be eyeing dual GTX 980 Ti or Fury Ten cards.
Testing Methodology
On the menu today we have x popular games to test at 4K. Nosotros'll measure minimum and average frame rates along with the 99th and 99.9th percentile frame times. The latest drivers from both camps will be used to ensure the best possible multi-GPU support.
The GTX 980 Ti SLI and R9 Fury X Crossfire cards will be tested with default core and memory frequencies as well as a maximum stable overclocked configuration.
- Intel Core i7-5960X (3.0GHz)
- x4 4GB Kingston Predator DDR4-2400 (CAS 12-13-13-24)
- Asrock X99 Extreme6 (Intel X99)
- Silverstone Strider Series (700w)
- Crucial MX200 1TB (SATA 6Gb/s)
- Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6144MB) SLI
- Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6144MB)
- AMD Radeon R9 Fury X(4096MB) Crossfire
- AMD Radeon R9 Fury 10(4096MB)
- HIS Radeon R9 390X (8192MB)
- AMD Radeon R9 295X2 (2x 4096MB)
- Microsoft Windows eight.i Pro 64-bit
- Nvidia GeForce 353.30
- AMD Catalyst fifteen.7
Benchmarks: Metro Redux, Tomb Raider
The GTX 980 Ti SLI philharmonic delivered a playable 43fps at 4K, though it did dip down to a mere 24fps on occasion. The Radeon R9 Fury X Crossfire setup might accept been 5% slower when measuring the average frame rate but was actually 17% faster when looking at the minimums.
Overclocked, the Fury X Crossfire setup was skillful for but a single actress frame while the overclocked Gainward GTX 980 Ti SLI configuration gained 12%, or 14% faster than the overclocked Fury X cards when comparing boilerplate frame rates.
Looking at the 99th percentile data, nosotros see that the Fury Ten cards pull well ahead of their GeForce rivals in Metro Redux. Here the overclocked Fury X pair was 18% faster than the GTX 980 Ti SLI overclocked configuration.
The Gainward GTX 980 Ti SLI configuration averaged 84fps, 18% faster than the standard non-overclocked GTX 980 Ti SLI cards and 25% faster than the R9 Fury X Crossfire overclocked setup.
The GTX 980 Ti SLI configurations pull even farther alee of the Fury X cards when comparing 99th percentile operation. Here the Gainward GTX 980 Ti SLI cards were 42% faster than the overclocked Fury 10 Crossfire setup.
Source: https://www.techspot.com/review/1033-gtx-980-ti-sli-r9-fury-x-crossfire/
Posted by: dobbinsladmoultan.blogspot.com
0 Response to "GeForce GTX 980 Ti SLI vs. Radeon R9 Fury X Crossfire"
Post a Comment